Filsafat Taoisme dan Quarter Life Crisis: Menggali Relevansi Pemikiran Filsafat Taoisme sebagai Upaya Mencegah Permasalahan Quarter Life Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-life crisis is a crisis condition that often attacks teenagers who are entering adulthood. This crisis usually makes young people feel doubtful, helpless, afraid, ignorant, empty, and other emotional disturbances such as panic, depression, confusion, frustration, worry, not knowing the direction of their future such as a mate, career, social relations, and so on. so on. To prevent the impact of the quarter-life crisis from happening to teenagers, one way that needs to be done is to study. In this context, studying previous thoughts is also very helpful in preventing quarter-life crises from happening to young people. In addition to getting methods for solving these problems, we can also add insight into the thoughts of previous people. Therefore, this paper will present the relevance of Taoist philosophy to prevent quarter-life crises. In this paper, the author will describe the history and philosophical thought of Taoism. Then from the ideas of Taoism that have been described, its relevance will be drawn to prevent a quarter-life crisis which consists of thoughts about Yin Yang, water as an analogy that describes the flow of Taoism, and the concept of Wu Wei
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".