MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387058315 · doi:10.33137/twpl.v45i1.41683

Nominal linkers in Persian

2023· article· en· W4387058315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Working Papers in Linguistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplement (music)PersianNounFocus (optics)LinguisticsNatural language processingNoun phraseElement (criminal law)MathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophyPolitical scienceBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines nominal constructions in (Iranian) Persian with the special focus on the distribution of Ezafe. Ezafe is an element which links a nominal to its modifiers and arguments. Persian has nominal modifiers of different types. They can be either prenominal or postnominal. The modifiers appearing in a postnominal position, always require Ezafe. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the use of Ezafe is not restricted only to modification, since it also links a noun to its complement. The use of Ezafe is not restricted only to noun phrases either since Ezafe can link a nominal preposition to its complement as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it