MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Load Dependent Modifications To Stimulated Concentric Torque-frequency And Angular Velocity-frequency Relationships In Human Knee Extensors

2023· article· en· W4387062398 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander M. Zero, Michael T. Paris, Charles L. Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcentricIsometric exerciseTorqueDynamometerIsotonicRange of motionAngular velocityPhysicsMathematicsMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGeometryClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To compare electrically stimulated concentric torque-frequency and angular velocity-frequency relationships during isotonic contractions at two loads. METHODS: In a Cybex dynamometer the right knee extensors of 10 healthy young (26 ± 4 years) adults were tested. Stimulating electrodes were placed transversely over proximal and distal portions of the knee extensors. Electrical current level was set to produce 50% isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque at 100 Hz. In the “isotonic mode” dynamic contractions were stimulated through a range of motion from 90 - 150°. With the dynamometer load set to 0% and 15% MVC, contractions were stimulated in ascending frequency at 1, 5, 7.5, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 75 and 100 Hz, with 20s of rest between contractions. Stimulation pulses ceased once full range of motion was achieved or when full range of motion was unachievable. RESULTS: Data are presented as a percentage of relative peak concentric torque or peak velocity for 100 Hz. For unloaded isotonic contractions, at 1 and 5 Hz velocity was ~58 and ~ 24 % lower than torque (both p < 0.003), with no difference at 7.5 Hz (p = 0.8). From 10 - 30 Hz velocity was 5 - 13 % greater than concentric torque (p = 0.0006 - 0.04). At 40 - 100 Hz there were no statistical differences ranging from 0 - 3%. During loaded isotonic contractions, frequencies up to 7.5 Hz did not produce enough torque to generate joint rotation and thus velocity was 0%. From 10 - 15 Hz peak velocity was 35-95% lower than torque (all p < 0.001). From 17 - 40 Hz velocity was 5 - 35% lower than torque (all p < 0.05). From 50 - 100 Hz differences were not statistically different (0 - 3%). CONCLUSIONS: During unloaded isotonic contractions stimulated at 10-30 Hz, the angular velocity-frequency relationship was shifted leftward relative to the concentric torque-frequency relationship. Conversely, during a moderately loaded isotonic contraction stimulated at 10 - 40 Hz, the angular velocity-frequency relationship was rightward shifted relative to the concentric torque-frequency relationship. Thus, altering the load during an isotonic contraction modifies both the angular velocity- and concentric torque-frequency relationships at moderate stimulation frequencies. Supported by NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→