Omega-3, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, And Cognitive Function In Mid-age And Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kimberly N. Doughty, Juliana Blazek, David Leonard, Carolyn E. Barlow, Laura F. DeFina, Omree Shuval, Stephen W Farrell FACSM, Kerem Shuval Higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids in red blood cells (omega-3 index or O3I) and high cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels are associated with reduced cognitive impairment, but little research has examined the relationship between O3I and cognitive function while accounting for CRF. PURPOSE: To examine the independent and joint association of omega-3 index and CRF on cognitive impairment among mid-age and older adults. METHODS: We analyzed data from 5,464 healthy men and women aged 55-85 years who had preventive medical examinations between 2009 and 2023. Primary exposures included O3I (<4.0%, 4.0-7.9%, or ≥ 8.0%) and age- and sex-based CRF quintile (1 = low, 2-3 = moderate, 4-5 = high). Cognitive impairment was defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of ≤25. We used Poisson regression to estimate relative risks of cognitive impairment, controlling for covariates. RESULTS: O3I <4% was associated with increased cognitive impairment relative to ≥8.0% (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.44) in a partially adjusted model. This association did not remain statistically significant in the fully adjusted model which included CRF. Low versus high CRF was associated with cognitive impairment (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.53), independent of O3I and clinical biomarkers. The interaction between CRF and O3I was not significant; risk was elevated with lower omega-3 index or CRF or both. CONCLUSION: When examined jointly, low CRF appears to be a stronger independent risk marker for cognitive impairment than low omega-3 index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".