MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact Of The Natural Menstrual And Hormonal Contraceptive Cycle On Brachial Artery Endothelial Function In Healthy Premenopausal Females.

2023· article· en· W4387062760 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer S. Williams, Jem L. Cheng, Jenna C. Stone, Emily K Van Berkel, Maureen J. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrachial arteryProgestinMedicineReactive hyperemiaDesogestrelMenstrual cycleEstrogenLevonorgestrelLuteal phaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyPlaceboEthinylestradiolGestodeneHormonePopulationBlood pressureFamily planningBlood flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) are the most common prescription for premenopausal women, with four generations of OCPs developed, each of which differs in synthetic estrogen and progestin dose and type of progestin. Commonly prescribed OCPs include 2nd generation OCPs (OCP2) containing levonorgestrel and 3rd generation OCPs (OCP3) containing desogestrel or norgestimate. Similar to phasic fluctuations in endogenous estrogen and progesterone in the natural menstrual cycle (NAT), OCP cycles include active (i.e., containing synthetic hormones) and placebo pill phases. Previous research has identified that NAT and/or OCP cycle phases may influence brachial artery endothelial function; however, research is limited, and findings are mixed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of NAT, OCP2, and OCP3 cycles on brachial artery endothelial function. METHODS: Forty-nine premenopausal females (n = 17 NAT, n = 17 OCP2, n = 15 OCP3) took part in two experimental visits in the low (LH: early follicular/placebo) and high (HH: mid-luteal/active) hormone phases of the hormonal cycle, in a randomized order. Brachial artery endothelial function was assessed using a reactive hyperemia flow mediated dilation (FMD) test, represented as percent (%FMD) changes in artery diameter. A linear mixed model ANOVA with factors group (NAT, OCP2, OCP3) and phase (LH, HH) was used to examine potential differences in baseline diameter and %FMD. RESULTS: Endothelial function (%FMD) was elevated in the HH phase compared to the LH phase, regardless of group [HH: 7.7 ± 3.5%, LH: 7.0 ± 3.3%, p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.18 (small effect)]. Brachial artery baseline diameter was lower in HH compared to LH [HH: 3.50 ± 0.40, LH: 3.53 ± 0.41, p = 0.04, Cohen’s d = 0.08 (small effect)]. The phasic difference observed in %FMD was no longer significant after differences in baseline diameter were controlled for (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Natural and hormonal contraceptive cycle phases do not appear to influence brachial artery endothelial function but may have a small influence on basal vascular tone. This research challenges the notion that the hormonal cycle phases must be controlled for in vascular physiology research, potentially reducing a perceived barrier to the inclusion of female participants in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207