MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect Of Beverage Temperature On Whole-body Heat Dissipation During Exercise-heat Stress In Older Men

2023· article· en· W4387062819 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brodie J. Richards, Nicholas J. Koetje, Kristina‐Marie T. Janetos, Fergus K. O’Connor, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIngestionFluid intakeThermoregulationFluid replacementCalorimetryThermal management of electronic devices and systemsHeat stressChemistryHeat illnessAnimal scienceMedicineInternal medicineThermodynamicsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inadequate fluid replacement during prolonged exercise in the heat can impair cardiovascular and thermoregulatory function. While regular fluid ingestion can mitigate this deterioration, studies show that relative to warm beverages, ingestion of cold drinks can reduce heat dissipation during exercise in young men. However, it is unclear if beverage temperature may have a similar effect in older adults. PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of cold (0 °C) and warm (37.5 °C) fluid ingestion on whole-body dry and evaporative heat exchange during exercise-heat stress in older men. METHODS: On separate days, six older men (mean [SD], age: 59 [3] years, VO2peak: 33.6 [3.7] mL/kg/min) performed four 15-min bouts of exercise at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production (200 W·m-2; to maintain a fixed thermal drive for heat loss), each separated by 15-min rest in the heat (40oC, ~15% RH). Before the first (Ex1) and third exercise (Ex3) bouts, participants consumed 5.2 g/kg of either cold or warm fluid over a ~ 10 min period. Rates (W·m-2) of whole-body total heat loss (dry + evaporative heat loss, via direct calorimetry), metabolic heat production (via indirect calorimetry) and change in core (rectal) temperature (ΔTrec, difference from pre-exercise rest) were measured continuously and expressed as peak responses (mean of final 5 minutes of the Ex1 and Ex3). Data were compared using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No differences in whole-body dry (Ex1: -57 [7] and -56 [7]; Ex3: -59 [7] and -57 [7] W·m-2) and evaporative heat loss (Ex1: 202 [27] and 223 [16]; Ex3: 226 [16] and 229 [20] W·m-2) were observed between cold and warm beverages, respectively (all p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant change in whole-body total heat loss (Ex1: 145 [24] and 167 [17]; Ex3: 166 [15] and 172 [17] W·m-2) was observed between beverage conditions (p > 0.05). Consequently, ΔTrec (0.15 [0.07] and 0.23 [0.08]; Ex3 (0.49 [0.11] and 0.68 [0.19] °C), was not different between cold and warm fluid conditions, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We show that the contribution of whole-body dry and evaporative heat exchange on the resulting changes in whole-body total heat loss during exercise-heat stress was not affected by beverage temperature in older men. FUNDING: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207