Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chez les peuples autochtones circumpolaires, en Eurasie comme en Amérique et au Groenland, des pratiques remarquablement similaires ont été documentées, consistant à attribuer aux nouveau-nés et aux enfants des chants individuels. Ceux-ci sont utilisés en tant que berceuses, c’est-à-dire afin d’accompagner l’endormissement, mais aussi pour consoler l’enfant, le motiver, le protéger, consolider son identité individuelle, susciter en lui joie, fierté ou embarras, sourires ou comportements infantiles, développer son attachement ou lui exprimer son amour et son attention. Cet article identifie un ensemble de similarités entre les traditions de peuples finno-ougriens, samoyèdes, paléoasiatiques et Inuit. L’hypothèse d’une diffusion par migrations à partir d’un foyer sibérien ou par échanges culturels continus entre populations circumpolaires est discutée. Cette étude souligne ainsi la propension des pratiques de l’intime à voyager et se maintenir avec une certaine permanence, en dépit des bouleversements sociaux et des expériences coloniales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".