MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387067475 · doi:10.7712/150123.9854.464528

ACOUSTIC GUIDED WAVE METHOD TO EVALUATE BLOCAGE IN DRAINS OF DAMS

2023· article· en· W4387067475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsComputer scienceGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need to reduce the inspection time of drains in dams done through video camera.A method based on acoustic guided wave propagation was developed.A system of loudspeaker and microphone was designed to send and receive at the mouth of drains acoustic waves.Physical models were developed to describe wave attenuation as it propagates and its reflection and transmission through consecutive obstructions.Extensive lab tests were undertaken in 3inch composite and 4inch fibro-cement pipes to evaluate the performances of these models.Wave attenuation coefficient and superposition factor for the recorded reflections were obtained for these two types of pipes.The effects of different pipe conditions were evaluated, such as: distinct and close proximity obstructions, cavity and pipe outlet.Tests were undertaken on actual drains of dams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207