INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT. ANALYSIS FROM THE CUBAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To understand the meaning of industrial property rights and their protection, importance can only be given to what is referred to in the doctrine, but it is transcendental to take into account that current and historical legislation reflects a truly remarkable variety in its meaning and direction to starting from the constitutional text and its development in Cuban substantive law.In the article an analysis is made of the legal historical tract of how the right of industrial property has been recognized in the Cuban legal system from the colony of Spain to the current 21st century in the updating of the economic and social model in the business environment, concomitant with International Industrial Property Law.In the new century, the information and communication technologies of the 4th Industrial Revolution have produced, and continue to produce, in an astonishing way, a change in the existence of humanity.The creation of new products and services surpass the previous ones that are similar to these and that in a way improve the quality of life of citizens, hence it is up to the Law to establish regulations in order to protect these individual rights and guide them according to their reality.The methods of the social sciences have been used: the historical logic in pursuit of studying the stages of the constitution on the rights of industrial property, analysis synthesis to break down the elements addressed in the article, and induction deduction.The study made it possible to determine that the legal regime on industrial property rights is not yet complete, an important group of regulations that should -by mandate of Law-complement existing regulations have not been incorporated; which produces a state of defenselessness before the performance by third parties of a series of activities authorized by the State that violate these industrial property rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".