MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387078505 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggad366

Marine CSEM synthetic study to assess the detection of CO2 escape and saturation changes within a submarine chimney connected to a CO2 storage site

2023· article· en· W4387078505 on OpenAlexaff
N. Yilo, Karen Weitemeyer, T. A. Minshull, Eric Attias, Héctor Marín‐Moreno, Ismael Himar Falcón-Suárez, Romina Gehrmann, Jonathan M. Bull

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityNatural Environment Research CouncilEuropean CommissionUniversity of SouthamptonSight Research UK
KeywordsGeologySaturation (graph theory)Chimney (locomotive)Carbon capture and storage (timeline)GeophonePorosityPetrologyPetroleum engineeringGeophysicsGeomorphologyOceanographyGeotechnical engineeringClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Carbon capture and storage (CCS) within sealed geological formations is an essential strategy to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, the primary goal of the 2015 United Nations Paris Agreement. Large-scale commercial development of geological CO2 storage requires high-resolution remote sensing methods to monitor CO2 migration during/after injection. A geological formation containing a CO2 phase in its pore space commonly exhibits higher electrical resistivity than brine-saturated (background) sediments. Here, we explore the added value of the marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method as an additional and relevant geophysical tool to monitor moderate to significant changes in CO2 saturation within a fluid conduit breaking through the seal of a CCS injection reservoir, using a suite of synthetic studies. Our 2-D CSEM synthetic models simulate various geological scenarios incorporating the main structural features and stratigraphy of two North Sea sites, the Scanner Pockmark and the Sleipner CCS site. Our results show significant differentiation of leakage through the seal with CO2 saturation ($S_{{\rm CO}_2}$) ranging between 20 and 50 per cent, while our rock physics model predicts that detection below 20 per cent would be challenging for CSEM alone. However, we are able to detect with our 2-D inversion models the effects of saturation with 10 and 20 per cent CO2 within a chimney with 10 per cent porosity. We demonstrate that simultaneous inversion of Ey and Ez synthetic electric field data facilitates a sharper delineation of a CO2 saturated chimney structure within the seal, whereas Ez synthetic data present higher sensitivity than Ey to $S_{{\rm CO}_2}$ variation, demonstrating the importance of acquiring the full 3-D electric field. This study illustrates the value of incorporating CSEM into measurement, monitoring and verification strategies for optimal operation of marine CCS sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207