MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387080267 · doi:10.1093/fh/crad038

‘Un jugement politique’: race, policy and punishment in colonial Saint-Domingue before 1789

2023· article· en· W4387080267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench History · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTNarrativePunishment (psychology)SolidarityArgument (complex analysis)Race (biology)ScholarshipHistoryCriminologyWhite (mutation)SociologyLawGender studiesPolitical scienceLiteraturePsychologyArtSocial psychologyArt historyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article analyses the trial of Félicité, an enslaved woman in Port-au-Prince, who was convicted of theft and arson in 1787 and sentenced to be executed. The case is of interest to historians, as it is one of the few complete surviving records of slave testimony from Saint-Domingue. By examining the testimony of Félicité and a number of her fellow slaves and free people of colour, the case sheds new light on the sociability and economic life of urban slaves, explores the meaning of marronage, questions the extent to which racial solidarity existed between slaves and free people of colour and probes the assertions of recent scholarship regarding the use of slave testimony as autobiographical narrative. In addition, the article advances the argument that the outcome of the trial revealed a number of fault-lines within the white governing classes, particularly over the question of the intersection between humanitarianism and judicial decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it