Convergent generation of atypical prions in knock-in mouse models of genetic prion disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Most cases of human prion disease arise due to spontaneous misfolding of wild-type or mutant prion protein. Though recapitulating spontaneous prion conversion in animal models has proven challenging, transgenic mice expressing the misfolding-prone bank vole prion protein (BVPrP) recreate certain key aspects of sporadic and genetic prion disease. However, it remains unclear whether spontaneous prion generation can occur in the absence of protein over-expression and how disease-causing mutations affect prion strain properties. To address these issues, we generated knock-in mice expressing physiological levels of either wild-type or mutant BVPrP with isoleucine at codon 109. While mice expressing wild-type BVPrP remained free from neurological disease, a subset of knock-in mice expressing BVPrP with mutations that cause either fatal familial insomnia (D178N) or familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (E200K) developed progressive neurological illness. Brains from spontaneously ill knock-in mice contained prion disease-specific neuropathological changes as well as atypical protease-resistant prion protein. Moreover, brain extracts from spontaneously ill D178N- or E200K-mutant BVPrP knock-in mice transmitted disease to mice expressing wild-type BVPrP. Surprisingly, the properties of the D178N- and E200K-mutant prions appeared identical both pre- and post-transmission, suggesting that both mutations guide the formation of a highly similar atypical prion strain. These findings imply that knock-in mice expressing mutant BVPrP spontaneously develop a bona fide prion disease and that mutations causing prion diseases may share a uniform initial mechanism of action. Therefore, these mice represent useful tools for studying the early stages of genetic prion diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".