MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387085341 · doi:10.59927/sig.v11i1.9

A TRANSMISSÃO DA PSICANÁLISE E OS GRUPOS

2022· article· pt· W4387085341 on OpenAlexaff
Emília Estivalet Broide

Bibliographic record

VenueSIG · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMonsanto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A psicanálise tem em seu cerne a experiência de um saber, o do inconsciente. Um saber que o sujeito não conhece, um saber imprevisível, um saber que não se sabe. Portanto, o ofício do psicanalista é uma práxis aberta à inquietação. Freud criou e colocou em circulação na cultura um método específico de escuta do sofrimento humano. Além das regras técnicas para o exercício da psicanálise, transmitiu um saber-fazer (savoir-faire) que só se adquire por uma experiência pessoal com o trabalho sobre si mesmo e no compartilhamento dessa aventura solitária com outros. Portanto, a transmissão da psicanálise não é sem os grupos. Nesse sentido, é importante pensar os grupos onde vigora o discurso psicanalítico, como lócus de produção de saber – tanto na relação entre analistas na construção viva da psicanálise quanto na realização de grupos fundados no discurso psicanalítico com fins terapêuticos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIGSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207