Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo foi extraído da minha dissertação de Mestrado “Arquitetura & Collage- um catálogo de obras relevantes do Século XX”, sob a orientação de Fernando Fuão_ Propar/UFRGS_2005. Resgata a retórica e a poética da collage através das análises efetuadas por diferentes autores como Fernando Fuão, Simón Fiz, Sergio Lima e outros e aglutina em forma de um Glossário Ilustrativo. Converte estes procedimentos num recurso didático capaz de explorar ainda mais o processo criativo da Collage. A elaboração do Glossário reforça a ideia de que fazer collage, não é só recortar e colar, mas de enriquecer este aprendizado e desenvolver a dimensão interpretativa das obras de Collages. A criação da collage como um conceito artístico atravessou o século XX até os nossos dias! Ela foi se transformando ao longo deste vasto período, em novas técnicas, novos procedimentos e novas denominações, resistindo ao longo do tempo, com toda a diversidade que o mundo contemporâneo impõe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".