Evolving a mitigation of the stress response pathway to change the basic chemistry of life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite billions of years of evolution, there have been only minor changes in the number and types of proteinogenic amino acids and the standard genetic code with codon assignments across the three domains of life. The rigidity of the genetic code sets it apart from other aspects of organismal evolution, giving rise to key questions about its origins and the constraints it places on innovation in translation. Through adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) in Escherichia coli , we aimed to replace tryptophan (Trp) in the genetic code with an analogue L-β-(thieno[3,2-b]pyrrolyl)alanine ([3,2]Tpa). This required Escherichia coli to recruit thienopyrrole instead of indole and allowed reassignment of UGG codons. Crossing the stress response system emerged as a major obstacle for ancestral growth in the presence of [3,2]Tp and Trp limitation. During ALE, a pivotal innovation was the deactivation of the master regulon RpoS, which allowed growth solely in the presence of [3,2]Tp in minimal medium. Notably, knocking out the rpoS gene in the ancestral strain also facilitated growth on [3,2]Tp. Our findings suggest that regulatory constraints, not just a rigid translation mechanism, guard Life’s canonical amino acid repertoire. This knowledge will not only facilitate the design of more effective synthetic amino acid incorporation systems but may also shed light on a general biological mechanism trapping organismal configurations in a status quo .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".