Optimal Control Design for Propeller Pendulum Systems Using Gorilla Troops Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study conducts a comprehensive examination of the nonlinear propeller pendulum system's angular position control, utilizing three distinct control strategies: Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller, State Feedback (SF) controller, and Sliding Mode Control (SMC).In order to optimize the performance of each controller, Gorilla Troops Optimization (GTO) is employed to identify the optimal value of the controllers' design parameters.The dynamics of the system under each controller are simulated via MATLAB software, and the performance of the controlled system is quantitatively assessed utilizing the Integral Time of Absolute Error (ITAE).The resilience of the controllers under uncertainties is evaluated by introducing an external disturbance to the system.Simulation results indicate that the SMC, tuned by GTO, exceeds the performance of the other controllers in reducing the settling time, eliminating maximum overshoot, and minimizing the ITAE index.Moreover, under external disturbance, the SMC tuned by GTO demonstrates superior robustness compared to other controllers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it