MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387104218 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.24174513.v1

Surface Susceptibility Synthesis of Spatially Dispersive Metasurfaces for Space Compression and Spatial Signal Processing

2023· preprint· en· W4387104218 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Dugan, T. Smy, Francesco Monticone, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchU.S. Air Force
KeywordsSurface (topology)Mathematical analysisMathematicsPolynomialBandwidth (computing)Space (punctuation)SolverBoundary value problemBoundary (topology)Field (mathematics)AlgorithmGeometryComputer scienceMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical method is proposed to synthesize the angle-dependent surface susceptibilities, χ of spatially dispersive or non-local zero-thickness metasurfaces. The proposed method is based on the extended Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs), whereby spatially dispersive metasurfaces are modeled using angle-dependent surface susceptibilities that take the form of rational polynomial functions of the transverse wave-vector, k∥. The suggested method derives the rational polynomial form of χ(k∥), which can then be expressed in the space-domain using spatial derivatives of the fields, resulting in a corresponding higher-order spatial boundary condition to achieve the desired field operation. The proposed synthesis method is illustrated using variety of examples such as, a space-plate, spatial filters and field absorbers, which are then validated using an Integral Equation (IE) solver, in which the corresponding higher-order boundary conditions are integrated to predict the scattered fields. The proposed method thus not only represents a simple way to synthesize ideal zero-thickness metasurfaces, but helps establishes a way to define fundamental operational limits of spatially dis- persive metasurfaces. This is illustrated by considering the space- plate example, and deriving the fundamental trade-off between operation bandwidth and the achievable space-compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207