MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387105327 · doi:10.1007/s10530-023-03164-7

Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Anomopoda) in central Mexico wetlands: implications of escape from ecotoxicological laboratories

2023· article· en· W4387105327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cristian Alberto Espinosa‐Rodríguez, Marco Antonio Jiménez‐Santos, Diana Meztli Martínez-Miranda, Elías Piedra‐Ibarra, Ligia Rivera-De la Parra, Alfonso Lugo

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Invasions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
KeywordsBiologyDaphnia magnaCladoceraEcologyWaterfowlDaphniaWetlandBranchiopodaZoologyCrustaceanHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Daphnia ( Ctenodaphnia ) magna , a species widely used for ecotoxicological tests, was recorded for the first time in waterbodies of the Mexican protected area and RAMSAR site Ciénegas del Lerma. The identity of the species was confirmed using morphological traits and cytochrome oxidase I as a molecular marker. Haplotypes were 100% identical to cultures used in laboratory bioassays in México and Canada. Individuals analyzed are related to strains from Europe, and their sequences differed from natural populations reported from the United States of America and Canada. This Mexican wetland supports a rich community of migratory waterfowl; therefore, D. magna could quickly spread to other waterbodies and cause potential adverse effects on local Daphnia species. The utilization of non-native species in ecotoxicological tests must be undertaken with great care, to ensure escape to natural waters is prevented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological InvasionsSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207