MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387108231 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560402

A High-Throughput Reconfigurable LDPC Codec for Wide Band Digital Communications

2023· article· fr· W4387108231 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Divyashree Yamadur Venkatesh, Komala Mallikarjunaiah, S Mallikarjunaswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVision Group on Science and TechnologyVisvesvaraya Technological University
KeywordsCodecThroughputLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceComputer architectureComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent days, an extensive digital communication process has been performed.Due to this phenomenon, proper maintenance of communication encoding and decoding parallel operation without any overhead such as signal attenuation code rate fluctuations during the digital parallel communication process can be minimized and optimized by adopting parallel encoder and decoder operations.To overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks by using proposed reconfigurable code rate cooperative (RCRC) using low-density parity check (LDPC) code for for Gigabits Wide Code Encoder/Dé coder Operations.The proposed RCRC is capable to vary the switch parallel operation as per the load.The lowdensity parity check (LDPC) is used for linear error correcting code in the communication process.it is very essential to reduce the power dissipation and noise in a transmission channel.Due to these phenomena, the decrease in power dissipation and enhancement of the accuracy in communication process are achieved and also operate over gigabits/sec data and it effectively performs linear encoding, dual diagonal form, widens the range of code rate and optimal degree distribution of LDPC mother code and all daughter codes for effectively performing the parallel switching operations in highly complex and wide range of code rate communication process.It is the highest upper bounded code rate as compared to the existing methods.The proposed method optimizes the transmission rate and is capable to operate on a 0.98 code rate.It is the highest upper bounded code rate as compared to the existing methods.the proposed method's implementation has been carried out using MATLAB and as per the simulation result, the proposed method is capable of reaching a throughput efficiency greater than 8.2 Gigabits per second with a clock frequency of 160MHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207