Improving the Response Time of a Soft Robotic Gripper Using a Heat Sink with Shape Memory Alloy Actuators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the time response analysis of a nickel titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloy-based soft robotic gripper with variable stiffness, with a particular emphasis on reducing the cooling time, which will ultimately lead to a faster response time.The manufacturing of the shape memory alloy is not covered in this work.The impact of a heat sink comprising a silicone casing and an ethylene glycol thermal compound on the response time was examined using Finite Element Analysis.The cylindrical cross-section of the gripper's finger was created as a three-dimensional model.Numerical analysis was done using Ansys Workbench, and experimental results validated the numerical results with a 1.12% percentage difference.A 36% overall improvement in response time was observed, indicating that the proposed heat sink is capable of acceleration the rate of heat dissipation from the shape memory alloy, and in turn improves the response time of the gripper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".