MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387115801 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.3440

Association between Pharmacists’ Country of Qualifying Education and Practising in a Hospital Setting: A Cross-Sectional Ontario Study

2023· article· en· W4387115801 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Deep Patel, Tim Mickleborough, Ali Elbeddini, Mhd Wasem Alsabbagh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacyFamily medicineMedicineAccreditationGraduation (instrument)Hospital pharmacyPharmacy practiceCross-sectional studyOdds ratioLogistic regressionResidenceClinical pharmacyMedical educationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It is hypothesized that international pharmacy graduates (IPGs) are underrepresented in more clinically challenging work. Objective: To examine the association between country of qualifying education for pharmacists in Ontario and the likelihood of practising in a hospital setting. Methods: This study was based on publicly available data from the Ontario College of Pharmacists website, specifically records for all Ontario pharmacists with authorization to provide patient care and for whom country of qualifying education and an accredited pharmacy as a place of practice were reported. Pharmacists who met the inclusion criteria were categorized as Canadian graduates or IPGs. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for reporting hospital pharmacy as a place of practice were estimated by fitting a logistic regression, with adjustment for gender and years since graduation. Results: A total of 14 689 pharmacists were included in the study: 7403 (50.4%) Canadian graduates and 7286 (49.6%) IPGs. These pharmacists worked in a total of 5028 accredited pharmacies (243 hospital pharmacies [4.8%] and 4785 community pharmacies [95.2%]). Among Canadian graduates, 2458 (33.2%) reported at least 1 hospital pharmacy practice site, whereas the proportion was much smaller among IPGs (427, 5.9%). Canadian graduates represented 85.2% (2458/2885) of all pharmacists who reported hospital practice. The estimated crude OR for practice in a hospital pharmacy was 7.98 (95% CI 7.16–8.91), and the adjusted OR was 7.12 (95% CI 6.39–7.98). Conclusions: IPGs may face barriers impeding their ability to practise in a hospital setting. Providing opportunities such as structured clinical training and experiential placements may facilitate integration of IPGs in institutional settings. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : On émet l’hypothèse que les diplômés internationaux en pharmacie (DIP) sont sous-représentés dans des tâches plus cliniquement exigeantes. Objectif : Étudier l’association entre le pays de formation qualifiante des pharmaciens en Ontario et la probabilité de pratiquer dans un environnement hospitalier. Méthodes : Cette étude se fondait sur des données accessibles au public sur le site Web de l’Ordre des pharmaciens de l’Ontario, plus précisément les dossiers de tous les pharmaciens de l’Ontario autorisés à prodiguer des soins aux patients et pour lesquels le pays de formation qualifiante ainsi qu’une pharmacie accréditée en tant que lieu de pratique étaient signalés. Les pharmaciens répondant aux critères d’inclusion ont été catégorisés en tant que diplômés canadiens ou DIP. Le rapport de cotes (RC) et l’intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95 % pour le signalement de la pharmacie pratiquée en milieu hospitalier ont été estimés en utilisant une régression logistique, tenant compte du sexe et du nombre d’années depuis l’obtention du diplôme. Résultats : Un total de 14 689 pharmaciens ont été inclus dans l’étude : 7403 (50,4 %) diplômés canadiens et 7286 (49,6 %) DIP. Ces pharmaciens travaillaient dans 5028 pharmacies accréditées au total (243 pharmacies en milieu hospitalier [4,8 %] et 4785 pharmacies communautaires [95,2 %]). Parmi les diplômés canadiens, 2458 (33,2 %) ont signalé au moins un site de pratique en pharmacie hospitalière, tandis que la proportion était beaucoup plus faible parmi les DIP (427, 5,9 %). Les diplômés canadiens représentaient 85,2 % (2458/2885) de tous les pharmaciens ayant signalé une pratique de la pharmacie en milieu hospitalier. Le rapport de cotes (RC) brut estimé pour la pratique en pharmacie en milieu hospitalier était de 7,98 (IC à 95 % 7,16-8,91), et le RC ajusté était de 7,12 (IC à 95 % 6,39-7,98). Conclusions : Les DIP peuvent être confrontés à des obstacles qui entravent leur capacité à exercer dans un environnement hospitalier. Offrir des occasions, comme des formations cliniques structurées et des stages expérientiels, pourrait faciliter leur intégration dans des milieux institutionnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicGlobal Health Workforce Issues→French-language works237,207→