The Dietary Diversity of Holometabolous Insects and the Construction of Food Webs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of food webs, as a core principle in ecology, reveals the interrelationships and interactions among populations. This article explores the dietary adaptations and roles of holometabolous insects within food webs, along with their connection to the stability of these networks. Initially, the life cycle and morphological changes of holometabolous insects are described, analyzing their diverse roles as both predators and prey within food webs. Subsequently, the concept of food webs, their construction methods, and the unique position of holometabolous insects within them are elucidated, emphasizing their influence on ecological balance. Following this, the concept of stability within food webs, the significance of elasticity and resilience, and the threats posed by human activities, such as habitat destruction and climate change, are discussed. Finally, trends in future food web research are presented, including interdisciplinary collaboration and systematic studies. Simultaneously, a call is made for reinforcing protective measures to safeguard holometabolous insects and the entirety of food webs, maintaining ecological equilibrium and biodiversity stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".