MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387122572 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.26.559629

Pan tissue analysis of human <i>NUMB</i> alternative splicing

2023· preprint· en· W4387122572 on OpenAlexafffund
Yangjing Zhang, C. Jane McGlade

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNUMBAlternative splicingExonGene isoformBiologyRNA splicingGeneticsGeneGene expressionMessenger RNACell biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alternative splicing (AS) of pre-mRNA generates multiple protein isoforms from a single gene. It is developmentally regulated and mis-regulation is associated with many diseases. Previous studies that examined AS of the cell fate determinant NUMB demonstrated that it undergoes a regulated switch in the inclusion of protein coding exons 3 and 9 during rodent development and the differentiation of human cell lines. Here we extend this work by comparing exon 9 and exon 3 inclusion levels of the human NUMB gene across different normal human tissues by analysis of RNA sequencing data deposited in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and the Vertebrate Alternative Splicing and Transcription (VastDB) databases. Our results support earlier studies and reveal specific Numb isoform expression patterns in previously unexamined tissue and cell types, suggesting that Numb isoform expression is regulated in the normal development of a broad range of tissue types throughout the body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→