Calcium storage in multivesicular endo-lysosome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is now established that endo-lysosomes, also referred to as late endosomes, serve as intracellular calcium store, in addition to the endoplasmic reticulum. While abundant calcium-binding proteins provide the latter compartment with its calcium storage capacity, essentially nothing is known about the mechanism responsible for calcium storage in endo-lysosomes. In this paper, we propose that the structural organization of endo-lysosomal membranes drives the calcium storage capacity of the compartment. Indeed, endo-lysosomes exhibit a characteristic multivesicular ultrastructure, with intralumenal membranes providing a large amount of additional bilayer surface. We used a theoretical approach to investigate the calcium storage capacity of endosomes, using known calcium binding affinities for bilayers and morphological data on endo-lysosome membrane organization. Finally, we tested our predictions experimentally after Sorting Nexin 3 depletion to decrease the intralumenal membrane content. We conclude that the major negatively-charge lipids and proteins of endo-lysosomes serve as calcium-binding molecules in the acidic calcium stores of mammalian cells, while the large surface area of intralumenal membranes provide the necessary storage capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".