Propagation of a pulsed nanosecond discharge on a water surface in non-symmetrical configuration, and comparison with the symmetrical configuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Non-thermal plasmas produced by pulsed nanosecond discharges at atmospheric pressure are of great interest for fundamental as well as technological and environmental applications due to their high reactivity. When generated in air in contact with water, these discharges induce many physical and chemical phenomena at the interface, including pattern formation. Although the patterns generated in symmetrical configuration have been extensively studied, those produced by asymmetrical discharges are not well characterized. In this study, we report the propagation dynamics of a nanosecond discharge produced in air in contact with water using electrodes mounted in parallel direction relative to the water surface (i.e. asymmetric configuration). The influence of the high voltage polarity and water electrical conductivity on the discharge pattern is investigated using fast imaging and electrical diagnostics. The obtained results demonstrate that under positive voltage polarity, plasma dots are produced along the ionization front. These dots have been previously observed in symmetrical configuration; however, their propagation velocity is greater in asymmetrical configuration, particularly in front of the anode. Under negative polarity conditions, a homogeneous emission pattern is observed, except in the area in front of the cathode, where dots are detected in the ionization front. Based on this data, the E-field threshold beyond which plasma dots are formed is estimated to be ∼5 × 10 8 V m −1 . Overall, the results reported herein provide a fundamental understanding of plasma-water interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".