Emotional Journey of Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and progressive disease associated with dysphagia and eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. EoE can have a negative impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL); however, there is very limited data reflecting the emotional journey of patients with EoE or their perceived unmet needs. The aim of this study was to determine the emotional impact of EoE on patients at each stage of the patient journey. METHODS: In this cross-sectional and qualitative research study, adult patients with EoE from eight different countries provided their experiences and feelings across each stage of the patient journey through one-on-one semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with EoE were enrolled in the study. The results of the one-on-one interviews showed that patients living with EoE go through an exhausting emotional experience during the different stages of the patient journey. In the pre-seeking-care stage, patients feel confused, afraid, frustrated, anxious, lonely, and misunderstood. During the diagnostic process, patients feel highly frustrated and angry because of the long and burdensome process. When EoE is finally diagnosed, patients feel liberated and relieved. When treatment is initiated, patients feel relief and enthusiasm, and, once the treatment starts to be effective and during the monitoring stage, they feel happier, less stressed, more confident, more relaxed, less fearful, and more in control owing to the improvement of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study pays attention to the different stages of the journey of patients with EoE. There is a lack of awareness by both physicians and patients that negatively affects every stage of the patient journey, but especially the initial phases of pre seeking care and diagnosis. We intend for this article to represent an opportunity to increase EoE awareness and to show the importance of considering the emotional impact on a patient with EoE's journey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".