MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387131379 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v16n10p24

Tourism Potential of China and Its Relevance for Jordan’s Economic Openness

2023· article· en· W4387131379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Omar Jraid Mustafa Alhanaqtah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismChinaRevenueBusinessTourism geographyEcotourismMarketingQuality (philosophy)Economic growthEconomicsPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article dwells on the analysis of the international tourism industry in China and directions of implementation of its positive innovations in the tourism industry in Jordan. The paper analysis data, characterizes the current state and examines the strategic directions of the development of the tourism industry in China. The tourism sector in Jordan is considered as one of the most promising. The aim is to turn tourism in Jordan from a seasonal into a year-round activity. Jordan is a small economy compared to China. Nevertheless, common features of economic recovery after pandemic and great counts on tourism as a source of continuous revenues make positive Chinese experience relevant for Jordanian economy. Additionally, Jordan has become an up-and-coming destination for Chinese tourists. We expect that improvements in Jordanian tourism sector will serve the same “accelerator button” as it worked for China. The practical significance of the study is to determine the directions for improving the international tourism industry in Jordan, namely the development of ecotourism and tourism for the elderly (medical tourism, historical and cultural tourism, social tourism, relaxation tourism); introduction of innovations and digital technologies (digital platforms and online booking, virtual tours and augmented reality, face recognition and other security technologies, artificial intelligence and data analytics, interactive multimedia technologies, smart tourism and the Internet of Things); development of business tourism; improvement of the quality of tourist services (staff training, strengthening control monitoring the quality of services and updating the infrastructure of tourist facilities); development of new forms of tourism (individual and thematic tours, virtual reality tours and tours related to cultural and educational experience); development of individual programs for tourists; improvement of public services and management systems in the field of tourism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicDiverse Scientific Research in UkraineFrench-language works237,207