MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387140764 · doi:10.1117/12.2676765

Novel methods of characterizing topological spin textures with neutron probes

2023· article· en· W4387140764 on OpenAlexaff
Dusan Sarenac, Wangchun Chen, Charles W. Clark, David G. Cory, Connor Kapahi, B. Heacock, Melissa E. Henderson, M. G. Huber, Lisa DeBeer‐Schmitt, Kirill Zhernenkov, D. A. Pushin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpintronicsNeutronCharacterization (materials science)ToolboxSpin (aerodynamics)SkyrmionMaterials scienceNanotechnologyPhysicsComputer scienceCondensed matter physicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of modern spintronics materials ushered the need for novel characterization tools capable of characterizing nanometer-sized spin textures. Neutrons are a convenient probe for this task due to their angstrom-sized wavelengths, electric neutrality and robustly controllable spin state. Recent research has focused on enabling access to new degrees of freedom in order to provide a neutron toolbox capable of characterizing emerging materials. This includes the development of tomography techniques for characterizing the 3D bulk spin textures and the techniques for creating neutron helical and skyrmion-like spin-orbit states. Here we provide a concise overview of this work and discuss future prospects and applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207