Transient Injection of Flow: How Torn and Bent Slabs Induce Unusual Mantle Circulation Patterns Near a Flat Slab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Torn and bent slabs are usually associated with flat‐slab subduction where the descending plate develops a horizontal geometry beneath the overlying continent. How such slab dynamics modify the surrounding mantle flow and the overriding plate remains enigmatic. Here, we conduct three‐dimensional subduction numerical experiments to investigate the flat slab to steep‐angle slab transition region and examine the impact of slab geometry changes on mantle flows. The results show that the along‐strike change due to flattening a segment of slab induces oblique flow toward the mantle corner at the transition region where flat slab bends to steep‐subducting slab. Slab tears can occur due to the buoyancy contrast between an oceanic ridge and the surrounding dense oceanic crust and/or presence of weak zones. A vertical tear at the side edge of a flat slab causes toroidal flow around the steep‐angle slab where sub‐slab mantle floods rapidly through the tear. Flow through the tear spreads to all directions including upwelling toward the continental base that may trigger slab and partial melting and thus affect arc magmatism. A horizontal tear that occurs ahead of the flat portion where slab resumes its steep‐angle results in enhanced plate‐motion parallel flow. Notably, the tear‐induced flow behaves as a rapid injection through the slab breach with the peak velocity up to an order of magnitude higher than plate motion, lasting for 1–2 million years after initially tearing. This rapid pulse flow might be recorded in surface tectonics as distinct transient events of topography or metamorphism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".