PERSEPSI HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP HAK CUTI MELAHIRKAN BAGI DOSEN Dan STAF UNIV. MUHAMMADIYAH PALOPO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami lebih lanjut tentang ketentuan hak cuti melahirkan terhadap pekerja perempuan di Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo dan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum hak cuti melahirkan terhadap tenaga kerja perempuan. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, maka tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, yang mana metode ini merupakan metode yang digunakan secara langsung terjun kelapangan untuk memperoleh kebenaran yang terjadi di lapangan. Penerapan pemberian cuti kepada pekerja perempuan di Universitas Muhammadiyah di Palopo sudah terlaksana dengan optimal, yang didasari oleh peraturan yang berlaku yakni dengan menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang KetenagaKerjaan sebagai dasar yuridis serta menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, Pelaksanaan pemberian hak cuti melahirkan terhadap pekerja perempuan di Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, sudah berjalan dengan baik dengan diberikannya waktu cuti 3 bulan yang mana sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang_Undang No. 13 tahun 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".