MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387148797 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109519

Power system resilience against climatic faults: An optimized self-healing approach using conservative voltage reduction

2023· article· en· W4387148797 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchAdvanced Technology Research Council
KeywordsDispatchable generationVoltage droopElectric power systemReliability engineeringReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceGridMathematical optimizationResilience (materials science)Control theory (sociology)Power (physics)EngineeringVoltageDistributed generationVoltage regulatorElectrical engineeringRenewable energyControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The resilience of power systems is critical in mitigating faults caused by the impending effects of climate change. Typical operational methods, such as network reconfiguration, may be insufficient to mitigate faults in the event of a contingency. On the other hand, reducing system demand may help increase the number of restored loads. As a result, this paper proposes a novel self-healing optimization approach based on a power grid concept known as conservative voltage reduction (CVR), which results in system demand reduction. The proposed optimization model is formulated as a mixed integer non-linear (MINLP) problem to fulfill an objective of minimizing unserved loads within the system. Voltage, thermal capacity, system radiality, and several more constraints have been taken into consideration while formulating the proposed model to handle both grid-connected and isolated modes of operation. Both dispatchable and non-dispatchable distributed generators (DGs) are taken into consideration. Dispatchable DGs are assumed to be capable of switching back and forth between constant power (PQ) and droop controls for the purpose of grid following and grid forming in grid-connected and isolated modes of operation, respectively. The proposed optimization approach is coded and solved using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) software. The IEEE 69-bus power distribution test system is utilized to test the validity and superiority of the proposed model. The results show that the proposed model effectively increases the system resilience by reducing the unserved power/energy within the system following a contingency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it