Power system resilience against climatic faults: An optimized self-healing approach using conservative voltage reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The resilience of power systems is critical in mitigating faults caused by the impending effects of climate change. Typical operational methods, such as network reconfiguration, may be insufficient to mitigate faults in the event of a contingency. On the other hand, reducing system demand may help increase the number of restored loads. As a result, this paper proposes a novel self-healing optimization approach based on a power grid concept known as conservative voltage reduction (CVR), which results in system demand reduction. The proposed optimization model is formulated as a mixed integer non-linear (MINLP) problem to fulfill an objective of minimizing unserved loads within the system. Voltage, thermal capacity, system radiality, and several more constraints have been taken into consideration while formulating the proposed model to handle both grid-connected and isolated modes of operation. Both dispatchable and non-dispatchable distributed generators (DGs) are taken into consideration. Dispatchable DGs are assumed to be capable of switching back and forth between constant power (PQ) and droop controls for the purpose of grid following and grid forming in grid-connected and isolated modes of operation, respectively. The proposed optimization approach is coded and solved using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) software. The IEEE 69-bus power distribution test system is utilized to test the validity and superiority of the proposed model. The results show that the proposed model effectively increases the system resilience by reducing the unserved power/energy within the system following a contingency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".