MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Post Quantum Code-Based Cryptosystems with Dual Inverse Matrix

2023· article· en· W4387149210 on OpenAlexaff
Farshid Haidary Makoui, T. Aaron Gulliver, Mohammad Dakhilalian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMcEliece cryptosystemCryptosystemComputer scienceHybrid cryptosystemTransposeCryptographyTheoretical computer scienceCode (set theory)AlgorithmPhysicsQuantum mechanicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Shor algorithm demonstrates the significant risk that quantum attacks pose to the security of widely used cryptographic primitives. However, code-based cryptography has been shown to be resistant to these attacks. To date, no polynomial-time attack exists that can break code-based cryptosystems such as the McEliece cryptosystem. Despite this, these cryptosystems are not employed in practical applications in domains such as online banking, blockchains, and e-commerce platforms. The primary reason is the large sizes of the public and private keys associated with code-based cryptosystems. In this paper, a new code-based cryptosystem is introduced which employs a dual matrix based on the transpose and inverse of the parity check matrix to reduce the key size compared to the McEliece cryptosystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207