MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387163568 · doi:10.1109/gtd49768.2023.00104

Exploring The Effect Of Different Load Models On System Reconfiguration

2023· article· en· W4387163568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationDispatchable generationWind powerNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceElectric power systemProbabilistic logicPower (physics)Load managementDistributed power generationDistributed computingReliability engineeringDistributed generationEngineeringRenewable energyElectrical engineeringComputer networkEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The self-healing framework has always aimed to restore as many loads as possible following a fault, which is usually accomplished by reconfiguring the power network. In most cases, the load is assumed to be a constant power load, and thus has no effect on the final network topology. According to recent research, the type of load and its equivalent model could influence how the network is reconfigured. This paper highlights and investigates the impact of various load types on the reconfiguration/self-healing scheme. A sensitivity analysis was performed on an islanded IEEE - 69 bus system with probabilistic wind turbines (WTs) and several dispatchable distributed generation (DGs) units. The cases examine the system with separate load types and then with a mix of load types. The results show that the load type affects the final topology of the system as well as the amount of energy not served after reconfiguration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207