Machine Learning based approaches for Identification and Prediction of diverse Mental Health Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, looking after our mental health has become as essential as maintaining our physical health and well-being. It is found that a lot of people belonging to different age groups, gender and a wide range of professional backgrounds suffer from different mental disorders globally that lead to sizable losses in health and functioning of an individual. Mental health issues such as depression, anxiety and stress can originate due to various biological, psychological, and environmental factors which give rise to suicidal thoughts. These challenges have encouraged the advancement of numerous machine learning based approaches for providing an impactful solution to predict and identify the severity of various mental health issues on time, and therefore suggest potential treatment outcomes. It has been observed that Machine learning is one of the most efficient approaches that can be used to analyze enormous amounts of data for making accurate predictions in the healthcare system. This paper explores various sources for data collection (Clinical questionnaires, interviews, social media, medical history and speech alterations), automated methods and ML-based depression detection algorithms of different classes including classification, regression algorithms, deep learning, and ensemble method used by researchers for analyzing varied mental health conditions. Few studies made use of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to reduce the class imbalance of the training data in order to achieve better accuracy. A comparison of different parameters such as objectives, results and limitations between the referred research papers presented in the domain of depression detection has also been included in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".