MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387164148 · doi:10.24908/qap.v1i1.16276

Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs Procession in British Columbia

2023· article· en· W4387164148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heili Poolsaar

Bibliographic record

VenueQapsule Queen s Undergraduate Health Sciences Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTorture, Ethics, and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecriminalizationProcessionIllicit drugMedicineGeographyCriminologyPharmacologyArchaeologyPsychologyDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On May 31, 2022, the Canadian federal government announced that residents 18 years and older in British Columbia will be able to possess small amounts of illicit drugs without legal penalty.The Controlled Drugs and Substances act prohibits illicit drug possession for Canadians, but beginning on January 31, 2023, residents will be allowed to possess 2.5g of illicit drugs including cocaine, methamphetamine, opioids, etc., despite this policy.B.C has experienced a heightened statistic of overdoses from illicit drugs due to unsafe drug using practices and contaminated drug supply, observing 10,000 deaths since 2016.This policy plans to remain in place for three years as a pilot to advocate for regular drug users, creating space for individuals to practice safe drug use in private establishments.It is important to note this policy does not decriminalize the sale of illicit drugs.Decriminalization will also minimize the stigma associated with drug addiction, providing safety for the drug-using population in treating the issue from a health perspective rather than a criminal perspective.1,2 Decriminalization of Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs Procession Illicit Drugs Procession in British Columbia in British Columbia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQapsule Queen s Undergraduate Health Sciences JournalSame topicTorture, Ethics, and LawFrench-language works237,207