MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387164952 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf767

Is a Recently Discovered H i Cloud near M94 a Starless Dark Matter Halo?

2023· article· en· W4387164952 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro Benítez-Llambay, Julio F. Navarro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersEuropean Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsHaloDark matterGalaxyAstronomyDark matter haloBaryonic dark matterSurface brightness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Observations with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope have revealed the presence of a marginally resolved source of 21 cm emission from a location ∼ 50 ′ from the M94 galaxy, without a stellar counterpart down to the surface brightness limit of the DESI Imaging Legacy Survey (∼29.15 mag arcsec−2 in the g band). The system (hereafter Cloud-9) has round column density isocontours and a line width consistent with thermal broadening from gas at T ∼ 2 × 104 K. These properties are unlike those of previously detected dark H i clouds and similar to the expected properties of REionization-Limited-H i Clouds (RELHICs), namely, starless dark matter (DM) halos filled with gas in hydrostatic equilibrium and in thermal equilibrium with the cosmic ultraviolet background. At the distance of M94, d ∼ 4.7 Mpc, we find that Cloud-9 is consistent with being a RELHIC inhabiting a Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) DM halo of mass M 200 ∼ 5 × 109 M ⊙ and concentration c NFW ∼ 13. Although the agreement between the model and observations is good, Cloud-9 appears to be slightly, but systematically, more extended than expected for ΛCDM RELHICs. This may imply either that Cloud-9 is much closer than implied by its recessional velocity, v CL9 ∼ 300 km s−1, or that its halo density profile is flatter than NFW, with a DM mass deficit greater than a factor of 10 at radii r ≲ 1 kpc. Further observations may aid in constraining these scenarios better and help elucidate whether Cloud-9 is the first ever observed RELHIC, a cornerstone prediction of the ΛCDM model on the smallest scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→