Isomer-Specific Solvatochromic and Molecular Rotor Properties of ESIPT-Active Push–Pull Fluorescent Chalcone Dyes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aromatic chromophores possessing intramolecular hydrogen-bonds that can undergo excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) are critical tools for chemosensing/biosensing applications because they create large Stokes-shifted fluorescence with no overlap with the absorption spectrum to limit back-ground interferences. Classic ESIPT-active fluorophores, such as the 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl) benzazole (HBX) series (X = NH, O, S), favor a ground-state (GS) enol (E) form that undergoes ESIPT to afford an excited-state (ES) keto (K) tautomer that generates red-shifted fluorescence. Herein, we have attached the HBX moiety to 6-methoxy-indanone (6MI) to create isomeric ( ortho and para ) ESIPT-active chalcone dyes and have characterized their photophysical properties in polar protic solvents (MeOH and glycerol (Gly)/MeOH mixtures) and a nonpolar aprotic (1,4-dioxane) solvent for comparison. The chalcones favor a GS E structure, which undergoes ESIPT in MeOH, Gly/MeOH mixtures, and dioxane to exclusively afford K emission with large Stokes shifts. The o -isomers possess expanded π-conjugation compared to their p -isomer counterparts, which diminishes their tendency to generate twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) states. Consequently, the o -isomers have greater quantum yields and lack molecular rotor (MR) character with little K emission response to increased solvent viscosity. However, they possess strong positive solvatochromism, displaying significant blue wavelength shifts coupled with turn-on K emission in moving from polar protic MeOH to nonpolar dioxane. In contrast, the p -isomers display MR character with turn-on K emission in 75:25 Gly/MeOH compared to their emission in MeOH (up to 14-fold) due to a strong tendency for TICT. Mechanistic insight into the observed isomer-specific photophysical properties of the ESIPT-active chalcones was obtained through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Implications for DNA biosensing applications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".