SPSVO: a self-supervised surgical perception stereo visual odometer for endoscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accurate tracking and reconstruction of surgical scenes is a critical enabling technology toward autonomous robotic surgery. In endoscopic examinations, computer vision has provided assistance in many aspects, such as aiding in diagnosis or scene reconstruction. Estimation of camera motion and scene reconstruction from intra-abdominal images are challenging due to irregular illumination and weak texture of endoscopic images. Current surgical 3D perception algorithms for camera and object pose estimation rely on geometric information (e.g., points, lines, and surfaces) obtained from optical images. Unfortunately, standard hand-crafted local features for pose estimation usually do not perform well in laparoscopic environments. In this paper, a novel self-supervised Surgical Perception Stereo Visual Odometer (SPSVO) framework is proposed to accurately estimate endoscopic pose and better assist surgeons in locating and diagnosing lesions. The proposed SPSVO system combines a self-learning feature extraction method and a self-supervised matching procedure to overcome the adverse effects of irregular illumination in endoscopic images. The framework of the proposed SPSVO includes image pre-processing, feature extraction, stereo matching, feature tracking, keyframe selection, and pose graph optimization. The SPSVO can simultaneously associate the appearance of extracted feature points and textural information for fast and accurate feature tracking. A nonlinear pose graph optimization method is adopted to facilitate the backend process. The effectiveness of the proposed SPSVO framework is demonstrated on a public endoscopic dataset, with the obtained root mean square error of trajectory tracking reaching 0.278 to 0.690 mm. The computation speed of the proposed SPSVO system can reach 71ms per frame.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".