MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387186053 · doi:10.1177/09596518231199261

Stabilizing unstable periodic orbit of unknown fractional-order systems via adaptive delayed feedback control

2023· article· en· W4387186053 on OpenAlexaff
Bahram Yaghooti, Kaveh Safavigerdini, Reza Hajiloo, Hassan Salarieh

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Nonlinear systemStability theoryAdaptive controlChaoticLyapunov functionTrajectoryOrbit (dynamics)MathematicsComputer scienceControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an adaptive nonlinear delayed feedback control scheme for stabilizing the unstable periodic orbit of unknown fractional-order chaotic systems. The proposed control framework uses the Lyapunov approach and sliding mode control technique to guarantee that the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable on a periodic trajectory sufficiently close to the unstable periodic orbit of the system. The proposed method has two significant advantages. First, it employs a direct adaptive control method, making it easy to implement this method on systems with unknown parameters. Second, the framework requires only the period of the unstable periodic orbit. The robustness of the closed-loop system against system uncertainties and external disturbances with unknown bounds is guaranteed. Simulations on fractional-order duffing and gyro systems are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the theoretical results. The simulation results demonstrate that our approach outperforms the previously developed linear feedback control method for stabilizing unstable periodic orbits in fractional-order chaotic systems, particularly in reducing steady-state error and achieving faster convergence of tracking error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control EngineeringSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207