Predicting Quality Properties of Pears during Storage Using Hyper Spectral Imaging System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the application of visible–near-infrared (Vis/NIR) spectroscopy for the estimation of various chemical attributes of pear fruit. Specifically, the paper investigates how pH, titratable acidity (TA), soluble solids content (SSC), and Vitamin C change as the pear undergoes different storage durations and temperatures. To obtain the most accurate prediction models, we applied a variety of pre-processing techniques to the acquired spectra. Notably, the combination of Savitzky-Golay (S.G.), Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC), and second derivatives (D2) emerged as the most effective method for predicting the fruit’s pH, with an impressive rp = 0.95 and SDR = 4.9. In contrast, combining S.G., MSC, and first derivatives (D1) yielded the most accurate predictions for TA, with a robust rp = 0.98 and SDR = 9.6. The research further delved into understanding how the storage period and temperature can significantly influence the pear fruit’s chemical properties. Our findings established that as the storage duration and temperature rise, the pH of the fruit also escalates, while TA sees a decline. The research further elucidates that prolonged storage periods and elevated temperatures lead to the pear fruit shedding its intrinsic qualities, resulting in a reduction in soluble solids and Vitamin C content. To summarize, this paper underscores the immense potential of Vis/NIR spectroscopy as a non-destructive and expedient tool for monitoring the chemical attributes of pear fruit during storage, especially when subjected to diverse temperature and time conditions. These insights not only add to the existing body of knowledge but also align with earlier research on how storage conditions can affect fruit quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".