MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387187092 · doi:10.3390/brainsci13101386

The Challenge of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cerebral Palsy: A Proposed Method to Identify White Matter Pathways

2023· article· en· W4387187092 on OpenAlexafffund
Ophélie Martinie, Philippe Karan, Élodie Traverse, Catherine Mercier, Maxime Descoteaux, Maxime T. Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de SherbrookeCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRéseau en Bio-Imagerie du Quebec
KeywordsWhite matterMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion MRINeuroimagingMedicineCerebral palsyComputer scienceMedical physicsNuclear medicinePsychologyRadiologyNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebral palsy (CP), a neuromotor disorder characterized by prenatal brain lesions, leads to white matter alterations and sensorimotor deficits. However, the CP-related diffusion neuroimaging literature lacks rigorous and consensual methodology for preprocessing and analyzing data due to methodological challenges caused by the lesion extent. Advanced methods are available to reconstruct diffusion signals and can update current advances in CP. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of analyzing diffusion CP data using a standardized and open-source pipeline. Eight children with CP (8-12 years old) underwent a single diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) session on a 3T scanner (Achieva 3.0T (TX), Philips Healthcare Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). Exclusion criteria were contraindication to MRI and claustrophobia. Anatomical and diffusion images were acquired. Data were corrected and analyzed using Tractoflow 2.3.0 version, an open-source and robust tool. The tracts were extracted with customized procedures based on existing atlases and freely accessed standardized libraries (ANTs, Scilpy). DTI, CSD, and NODDI metrics were computed for each tract. Despite lesion heterogeneity and size, we successfully reconstructed major pathways, except for a participant with a larger lesion. Our results highlight the feasibility of identifying and quantifying subtle white matter pathways. Ultimately, this will increase our understanding of the clinical symptoms to provide precision medicine and optimize rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain SciencesSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207