Bibliographic record
Abstract
The peculiarities of modern climate warming and the influence of global atmospheric circulation on it are considered from the position of solar-terrestrial relations. The role of the main atmospheric currents between the equator and both poles of the Earth is so great that for four decades it has caused unprecedentedly strong forest fires and other natural disasters which affected not only Siberia and Southern Europe (Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Greece and others) but also the USA, Canada and Australia. Another phenomenon of the modern climate is a paradoxically high winter warming in the zone of the Siberian anticyclone. Due to intensification of meridian circulation since the last quarter of the 20th century, the increase in mean annual temperature at the cold pole of the Northern Hemisphere in Yakutia has twice exceeded indicators of other regions and dictates the course of warming of all Northern Asia and North America. The warming wave from the center of the Yakutian core has even reached the southern periphery of the anticyclone in the Northern Tien Shan. The practical side of the study concerns the actively developing oil and gas complex of Yakutia. In nearest future Yakutia will not leave the zone of dangerous forest fires. Along with the costs of extinguishing fires, additional expenses will be required here to deal with post-fire cryogenic transformations of the highly porous base soils. Atmospheric meridian circulation is too large-scale phenomenon to avoid it at the regional level. It amplifies the dynamics of all natural processes in both hemispheres of the Earth and is modulated only by the Sun’s activity in the course of its 11-year and hundred-year cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".