L’antiracisme au Québec : nouvelles solidarités et disqualification sociale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mise en cause pêle-mêle du colonialisme, du capitalisme, de la suprématie blanche et de l’hétéropatriarcat par les mouvements noirs et les mouvements autochtones au Québec tend à favoriser de nouvelles solidarités entre ces acteurs auparavant cantonnés à porter des revendications particulières. En pressant la société a adopté un nouveau regard sur elle-même, ces acteurs antiracistes redessinent les frontières internes de la sphère civile québécoise, non sans être l’objet de rejet à travers des processus de disqualification sociale qu’il convient d’analyser. La contestation par des acteurs noirs et autochtones de deux pièces de théâtre puis la déprogrammation de ces pièces tiennent lieu de cas empiriques pour appréhender les valeurs et les dimensions morales sous-tendant ces processus de disqualification. L’analyse de la presse écrite québécoise permet également de restituer la dynamique de construction et de positionnement de la gauche et de la droite au Québec et de comprendre sur quels fondements se reconfigurent les lignes de démarcation politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".