MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387215909 · doi:10.33448/rsd-v12i9.33194

Diagnostic, Conservation and Bridge Monitoring – Application to the Bridge over the Kwanza River

2023· article· en· W4387215909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dilson Antonio

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Society and Development · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)DirectiveSustainable developmentBusinessEngineeringConstruction engineeringEnvironmental resource managementEngineering managementEngineering ethicsEnvironmental planningComputer sciencePolitical scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural monitoring significantly contributes to greater and better knowledge of the real behavior of structures, having positive consequences both from an economic and social point of view. Currently, observation and monitoring is increasingly based on measurement systems that are an integral part of the structure. Sustainable engineering is something we have to keep in mind throughout the project, from planning and design to execution and operation. The Article will also mention 10 guidelines from the National Directive on Sustainable Development and Environmental Management of Professional Engineers, which was produced by Engineers Canada in 2016. The aim of these guidelines is to encourage Engineers to be proactive in protecting and managing a responsible environment. part inherent to the duties assumed by all engineers: researchers, academics, consultants, regulators or managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Society and DevelopmentSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207