MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387221006 · doi:10.60122/j.ijs.2023.20.13

Five-year Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation and Cardiogenic Shock

2023· article· en· W4387221006 on OpenAlexaff
Aleksander Dokollari, Basel Ramlawi, Eric Gnall, Harish Jarrett, Katherine Hawthorne, Nitin Ghorparde, Ozgun Erten, Roberto Rodriguez, Sandra Abramson, Scott Goldman, Serge Sicouri, William A. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiogenic shockMedicineMitral regurgitationHeart failureCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionMyocardial infarctionAtrial fibrillationShock (circulatory)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To analyze five-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients presenting with acute cardiogenic shock (CS) who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for moderate or severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent TEER for MR were identified from our institutional medical records between 2015 and 2022. Patients presenting with CS undergoing TEER were included in the primary analysis. MR was diagnosed based on patient's echocardiographic findings and CS was diagnosed according to the definition in the TVT registry and/or presence of inotrope use prior to procedure and/or mechanical circulatory support prior to procedure. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to analyze outcomes. Primary outcome was five-year incidence of all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and readmission for heart failure (HF). Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 81±10.4 years and 16 patients (45.7%) were male. Mean STS-score was 10.2±7.1. Nine (25.7%) patients had prior myocardial infarction (MI), 22 (62.8%) had previous atrial fibrillation, while 9 (25.7%) patients were hospitalized for HF within the past year. MR etiology was degenerative (71.4%), functional (22.9%), and mixed (5.7%). Prior to presentation with CS, NYHA classification included 2 (5,7%) patients in class I, 6 (17.1%) in class II, 13 (37.1%) in class III, and 14 (40%) in class IV. Pre-procedural mean LVEF was 56.4 ± 13%. Procedural characteristics included mean procedural time (from access to guide removal) of 2.0 ± 0.6 hours, > 1 implanted device in 14 (40.0%) patients, 1 patient had a single leaflet attachment. There was no procedural device embolism, device thrombosis, conversion to sternotomy, life threatening bleeding, stroke, MI, or death. Mean postoperative length of stay was 5.1 ± 4.4 days. During their hospital stay, a transient ischemic attack event occurred in 1 patient; however, no MI, stroke, or death were observed in any patient. During the follow-up, 13 (37.1%) patients were readmitted for HF, 1 patient needed mitral valve replacement and 1 patient needed new TEER. At 5 years, only 4 (11.4%) patients were alive. Conclusion: Despite excellent procedural and early outcomes for patients with significant MR and CS undergoing TEER, poor survival was observed after 5 years, which may be related to advanced age of this cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207