Bibliographic record
Abstract
absolute advantage see competitive advantage absorptive capacity, technology diffusion 110 activism, environmental 82 agents of production 13 aggregate demand 93, 169, 219 allocative efficiency 114 government failures 195 impact of IBAs 144-7 index of competitiveness 270 institutional framework 158 anti-competitive behaviour 165, 178 appropriability regime innovatory incentives 157 outward direct investment 140 successful innovation 106-7, 108 Arthur, Brian 76 asset bubbles 54-5 Australia economic performance 261-2, 263, 268 income inequality 92 Austria, economic performance 266, 268 basic resources 100 behavioural strategies, cognitive dissonance 61-4 Belgium, economic performance 268 beliefs, socio-economic integration 65 benchmarking competitiveness 32 organizational arrangements 250 see also competitiveness indices best practice organizational paradigm 70, 223, 238-9 blind men and the elephant metaphor 9 Bohm, D. and Peat, D. 63-4 bounded rationality government failures 201 high coordination costs 221 information asymmetries 186 technical efficiency 115 bureaucratic rent seeking 199 business globalization of 80-1, 95 see also international business activities Canada economic performance 264, 268 income inequality 92 capital investments, technology diffusion 109 rates of return on 259t see also equity and venture capital carrier branches 43, 179 catching up GDP growth 260 paradigm shifts 74-5 chance events, dominance of inferior technology 76 Chang, H.J. and Rowthorn, B. 234-5 classical growth theory 13 classical philosophies, interest in 65-6 club goods 183, 185 Club of Rome 81 clubs, small groups of states 243 co-specialized tasks 86 Coase, Ronald 207-8, 216, 217 codified information products 184 codified knowledge 106, 110 cognitive consonance 59 cognitive dissonance 59-64 collective behaviour, socio-institutional adjustment 67 Common, John R. 153 common property goods 183, 227 communication long distance 133-4 socio-institutional adjustment 68-9
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".