MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387235632 · doi:10.2118/216371-ms

Prescriptive Analytics of a Surface Safety Valve at the Edge

2023· article· en· W4387235632 on OpenAlexaff
H. Gharib, Michael Whitehead, Michael Chin, H. Flesher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringReal-time computingComputer scienceReliability engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A Surface Safety Valve (SSV) on wellheads and flow lines is the last line of defense to protect personnel, environment, and assets from potential catastrophic damages. With the rising demand to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG), spills, and limit operational footprints, digital transformation combined with electrification and smart algorithms are critical steps towards achieving this goal. This paper presents the recent development of a surface safety valve (SSV) controlled by an IOT-based smart emergency shutdown (ESD) system that integrates, at the wellhead, an electro-hydraulic power unit with control elements, sensors, edge computer/controller, and remote connectivity in a hybrid edge-cloud platform. Real-time data from position, pressure, and temperature sensors digitally transform the SSV and are used to feed the diagnostic algorithms. In addition to triggering an ESD event, these algorithms monitor the condition of the SSV and control circuit. This is conducted through coupling the real-time processed data with physics-based models to evaluate the SSV system health. Evaluation of the SSV and smart ESD system performance was conducted using a laboratory test unit and the major components were field tested. Sensors and control elements data was processed into three primary sets of key performance indicators (KPIs): valve health, hydraulic circuit and actuation health, and hydraulic leakage detection. The effect of varying the process line pressure on the valve signature was evaluated and compared to the available physics-based models, which showed close correlation. Moreover, coupling of the experimental data with the physics-based models was able to solve for the individual thrust load components including valve gate drag, stem force, friction, and spring pre-load from the total measured pressure. The response time during SSV closing or partial stroking was evaluated at incremental time steps to identify the source of potential malfunction in the control circuit and SSV. An emulation of hydraulic leakage revealed distinctive pressure signatures between the low- and high-pressure circuits, thus identifying the location of the leakage in the hydraulic circuit. This allows locating the exact source of malfunction in the SSV, while running prescriptive analytics to suggest component specific corrective actions. Most of the published SSV condition monitoring efforts focus on the process valve health with less attention to the hydraulic circuit, which is a critical element of the overall SSV reliability and performance. The presented smart ESD system bridges this gap by digitally transforming the SSV to provide prescriptive analytics not only to process valve components, but also the hydraulic circuit and actuator components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207