MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387235867 · doi:10.2118/216366-ms

Wells and Facilities Instrumentation and Automation Towards Achieving Field Intelligence

2023· article· en· W4387235867 on OpenAlexaff
Muzahidin Muhamed Salim, Ian Traboulay, G. S. U. Ahmed, E. Ibrahim, Sara A. A. M. Al Wehaibi, Omran Al Hammadi, Nasser A. Ballaith, M. Al Houqani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadWirelineSCADAInstrumentation (computer programming)Petroleum engineeringEngineeringWell controlAnalyticsEnvironmental geologyReservoir engineeringComputer scienceGeologyMechanical engineeringPetroleumData scienceElectrical engineeringDrilling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A well is a conduit that connects the hydrocarbon deposits in the subsurface to the facilities that transfers and processes it. Understanding the flow of oil or gas through the source rock can only be made possible from the wells itself. Aside from the flow conduits, wells are the only point of reference to understand the field wide behavior. This information is critical to manage the reservoir, ensuring sustainable production throughout the field life. Traditionally, acquiring data from the subsurface to the wellhead relies on intervention, conveying instruments downhole with wireline or coiled tubing. Though effective, this activity incurs costs, logistically challenging and only sporadically available. Surface flow parameters such as rate and pressure are usually measured by analog gauges and Barton chart measurements, which are read manually by personnel to be tabulated later. In most cases, these data can be lost without a proper data management system in place. With the advent of digital instruments, parameters such as pressure, temperature and flowrates; can now be measured automatically and transmitted to a DCS or SCADA system. Some downhole completions are now equipped with instruments that are robust and accurate to take measurements even in extreme conditions of heat and pressure. With data at high availability, engineers are now able to conduct analysis faster, applying data analytics, collaboration and decision making. The main value for Digital Oilfield (DOF) is to save time in data retrieval, analysis and decision making and allow domain engineers to perform higher analytical function and decision making, taking them out from repetitive, manual work through automation. This paper will describe the minimum instrumentations for all well types and major oil and as process facilities for real time data acquisition required to run DOF workflows. This covers subsurface wellbore to production manifold to custody transfer meters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207