FOREIGN PRACTICES OF STATE FINANCIAL POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN BRIDGE-LIKE NATIONAL ECONOMIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the formation of public financial policy in post-crisis national economies in foreign countries: special attention is paid to the implementation of public financial policy in countries such as Belgium, Australia, Canada, and also describes the experience of Norway, Germany, Japan, New Zealand). The author of the study gives the opinion that it is budgetary policy as part of financial policy that plays a priority role and is the main tool in solving problems and tasks in the post-crisis period, and also puts forward the basic priorities of responsible budgetary policy in the social sphere in conditions of macroeconomic instability, including within the framework of the Great Isolation. The article concludes that the best foreign practices in post-crisis economies are associated with the reorientation of public spending to support national economies and the creation of favorable conditions for improving the welfare of citizens, the growth of enterprises, entrepreneurship. Foreign practices are represented by a set of measures of the governments of these countries (socio-economic programs, subsidies, investments, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".