MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387241313 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01192

Discovery of a 53BP1 Small Molecule Antagonist Using a Focused DNA-Encoded Library Screen

2023· article· en· W4387241313 on OpenAlexafffund
Devan J. Shell, Caroline A. Foley, Qinhong Wang, Chelsea M. Smith, Shiva Krishna Reddy Guduru, Hong Zeng, Aiping Dong, Jacqueline L. Norris‐Drouin, Matthew Axtman, P. Brian Hardy, Gaorav P. Gupta, Levon Halabelian, Stephen V. Frye, Lindsey I. James, Kenneth H. Pearce

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
FundersInnovative Medicines InitiativeNational Cancer InstituteStructural Genomics ConsortiumJanssen PharmaceuticalsMerck KGaATakeda FoundationLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Institute of General Medical SciencesGenome CanadaGenentechBayerPfizerEshelman Institute for Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillBristol-Myers SquibbBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsChemistrySmall moleculeDNADNA repairCarcinogenesisDNA damageMolecular biologyFörster resonance energy transferComputational biologyCell biologyGeneBiochemistryBiologyFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methyl-lysine reader p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is a central mediator of DNA break repair and is associated with various human diseases, including cancer. Thus, high-quality 53BP1 chemical probes can aid in further understanding the role of 53BP1 in genome repair pathways. Herein, we utilized focused DNA-encoded library screening to identify the novel hit compound UNC8531, which binds the 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain (TTD) with an IC 50 of 0.47 ± 0.09 μM in a TR-FRET assay and K d values of 0.85 ± 0.17 and 0.79 ± 0.52 μM in ITC and SPR, respectively. UNC8531 was cocrystallized with the 53BP1 TTD to guide further optimization efforts, leading to UNC9512. NanoBRET and 53BP1-dependent foci formation experiments confirmed cellular target engagement. These results show that UNC9512 is a best-in-class small molecule 53BP1 antagonist that can aid further studies investigating the role of 53BP1 in DNA repair, gene editing, and oncogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207